Manus Invitation Code Application Guide
Character.AI launches AvatarFX: AI video generation model allows static images to "open to speak"
Manychat completes US$140 million Series B financing, using AI to accelerate global social e-commerce layout
Google AI Overview Severely Impacts SEO Click-through Rate: Ahrefs Research shows traffic drop by more than 34%
The following is a comprehensive comparison between Google Gemini and OpenAI ChatGPT, covering functions, model capabilities, pricing, API access, usage scenarios, advantages and disadvantages, and common problems. This comparison is based on the latest data and review results for 2025.
Overview comparison table
project | Google Gemini | OpenAI ChatGPT |
---|---|---|
Model version | Gemini 1.5 Pro, Advanced, Flash, etc. | GPT-4o, GPT-4, GPT-3.5 |
Multimodal capability | Strong (text, images, audio, video) | Strong (text, images, audio) |
Context window | Up to 2 million tokens (Gemini 1.5 Pro) | Up to 128,000 tokens (GPT-4o) |
Image generation | Imagen 3 | DALL·E 3 |
Video generation | Veo 2 (Gemini only supports) | Not supported |
Voice interaction | Gemini Live (Android) | ChatGPT Voice (iOS & Android) |
API Pricing | Complex, billed by model and input/output type | Simple, billed by token |
Free features | Provides multiple free features (such as Gemini Flash) | GPT-3.5 free version available |
Subscription Price | $20/month (including 2TB cloud storage and Gemini Advanced) | $20/month (ChatGPT Plus) |
Search Integration | Built-in Google Search | Bing (via plugin) |
Code capability | Strong, suitable for technical users | Strong, suitable for developers |
Localization capability | Strong, especially in Southeast Asian market | Good globalization |
Typical advantages | Multimodal processing, search integration, large context capacity | High quality of text generation and strong logical reasoning |
Model Comparison
Text generation and reasoning
ChatGPT: Excellent in logical reasoning, writing, programming, etc., suitable for tasks that require in-depth text processing.
Gemini: Excellent in creative writing, technical problem solving and practical guidance, especially when dealing with complex tasks.
Multimodal processing
Gemini: supports text, images, audio and video processing, and has powerful multimodal capabilities.
ChatGPT: Supports text, images and audio processing, but does not support video generation.
Image and video generation
Gemini: Generate high-quality images through Imagen 3 and supports Veo 2 video generation.
ChatGPT: Generate images through DALL·E 3, but video generation is not supported.
Pricing and API access
Google Gemini
Free tier: Provides free models such as Gemini Flash, suitable for beginners.
Paid tier: Gemini Advanced ($20/month), including 2TB of cloud storage and advanced model access.
API pricing: billed according to model and input/output types. For specific prices, please refer to the official documentation.
OpenAI ChatGPT
Free level: GPT-3.5 free version is available, suitable for daily use.
Paid tier: ChatGPT Plus ($20/month), providing GPT-4o access and faster response speeds.
API pricing: billed by token. For details, please refer to the official OpenAI document.
Usage scenarios and advantages
Use scenarios | Recommended platform | reason |
---|---|---|
Technical Writing and Programming | ChatGPT | Clear logic and strong code generation ability. |
Creative writing and content generation | Gemini | It has strong multimodal processing capabilities and is suitable for creative tasks. |
Multilingual support | ChatGPT | Supports multiple languages and is suitable for users around the world. |
Search and information acquisition | Gemini | Built-in Google search, easy to obtain information. |
Image and video generation | Gemini | Supports high-quality image and video generation. |
Frequently Asked Questions and Precautions
Context Length Limit: Gemini has a larger context window, suitable for long text tasks.
Multimodal capability: Gemini supports more types of inputs, suitable for tasks that require processing multiple data types.
API access difficulty: ChatGPT's API access is relatively simple and is suitable for developers to quickly integrate.
Localization support: Gemini performs well in the Southeast Asian market and is suitable for users in the region.
in conclusion
Choose Gemini: If you need to work on multiple data types (such as images, audio, video), or want to take advantage of Google's ecosystem (such as search, Docs, Sheets), Gemini is a more suitable choice.
Choosing ChatGPT: If your main task is text processing, programming, or requires extensive language support, ChatGPT is better suited to your needs.