English
English
Manus Invitation Code Application Guide
Character.AI launches AvatarFX: AI video generation model allows static images to "open to speak"
Manychat completes US$140 million Series B financing, using AI to accelerate global social e-commerce layout
Google AI Overview Severely Impacts SEO Click-through Rate: Ahrefs Research shows traffic drop by more than 34%
Gemini (developed by Google) and Perplexity AI are two powerful AI assistants, each with different advantages. Which one is better depends on your usage needs. Here is their comparison analysis:
Basic introduction comparison
| project | Gemini (released by Google) | Perplexity (AI search engine + Q&A) |
|---|---|---|
| type | General large language model (benchmarking GPT-4) | AI search question and answer engine (combined with real-time information) |
| Model version | Gemini 1.5 Pro / Flash / Nano etc. | Use OpenAI API (GPT-4/Claude) etc. |
| Core abilities | Multimodal understanding, writing, programming, reasoning, creation, etc. | Quick search, integrate information, quote sources, real-time answers |
| Is it connected to the Internet | There is an Internet version (such as Gemini Advanced) | Default networking, all answers are based on real-time network content |
| Pay threshold | Free & Premium Edition (Google One Subscription) | The free version is already very strong, Pro provides more model switching |
Gemini is more suitable for scenarios:
In-depth creative users who need writing, programming, translation, and content generation
Multimodal tasks (image understanding, PDF analysis, graph generation)
Deep integration with Google Workspace (Gmail, Docs, Sheets)
For example:
Want to use AI to help write a draft paper
Want AI to explain an uploaded chart
Want to seamlessly use AI features in Gmail/Docs
Perplexity is more suitable for scenarios:
Quickly find answers to questions + search for quotation links in real time
Want to know the latest news, academic information or product comparisons
Want to see the source of the citation and the original page behind the answer
For example:
Want to know about the "2025 latest AI model ranking" and see the citation source
Want to quickly get a comprehensive information and read it in depth by yourself
Want to compare the advantages and disadvantages of two products and accompany the data source
Summary and comparison
| Content generation | ✅ Very strong | General (mainly search) |
| Search capability | Have internet connection but not specialized | ✅ Extremely strong, almost ideal combination of AI+ search |
| Quotes and Sources | Yes, but not systematic | ✅ Automatic citation, suitable for research |
| Simple and easy to use interface | More creative tools | ✅ Concise, fast response, suitable for light users |
| Conversation style | More natural, more like a chat assistant | Flanked Question and Answer and Information Summary |
| Multimodal support | ✅ Supports images, audio, files, etc. | None (mainly text and links) |