English
English
Manus Invitation Code Application Guide
Character.AI launches AvatarFX: AI video generation model allows static images to "open to speak"
Manychat completes US$140 million Series B financing, using AI to accelerate global social e-commerce layout
Google AI Overview Severely Impacts SEO Click-through Rate: Ahrefs Research shows traffic drop by more than 34%
The following is a detailed comparison between Google Gemini and Anthropic Claude, covering model capabilities, context windows, API access, pricing, usage scenarios, etc., to help you choose the right AI tool according to your needs.
Overview comparison table
| project | Google Gemini 2.5 Pro | Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet / Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Model capability | Strong multimodal (text, image, audio, video) processing capability | Emphasize text generation, reasoning and code capabilities |
| Context window | Up to 1 million tokens, with plans to expand to 2 million tokens | Up to 200K tokens, some models support larger windows |
| Programming capabilities | Excellent performance in programming tasks with an accuracy of approximately 63.8% | Strong programming ability, with an accuracy rate of about 62.3%. |
| Search Integration | Built-in Google search, providing real-time information retrieval | No built-in search function |
| Image/video generation | Supports image (Imagen 3) and video (Veo 2) generation | Image or video generation is not supported |
| API access | Provided through Google AI Studio, it supports multiple model access | Provided through the Anthropic API, mainly supports text processing |
| Pricing structure | Billing by model and input/output type, free hierarchy | Free trial is provided. Please contact Anthropic for detailed pricing. |
| Applicable scenarios | Multimodal content generation, search integration, complex task processing | Text generation, complex reasoning, code writing |
Model Comparison
Programming and technical tasks
Gemini 2.5 Pro: Excellent in programming tasks, capable of generating high-quality code and providing accurate solutions in complex tasks.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: It has strong programming capabilities and is suitable for handling complex code tasks, but is slightly inferior to Gemini in some tests.
Multimodal processing
Gemini: Supports the processing of text, images, audio and video, suitable for tasks that require multiple data types.
Claude: mainly focuses on text processing and does not support image or video generation.
Pricing and API access
Google Gemini
Free tier: Provides free models such as Gemini Flash, suitable for beginners.
Paid level: billed according to model and input/output type. For specific prices, please refer to the official documentation.
API access: Provided through Google AI Studio, it supports multiple model access.
Anthropic Claude
Free Trial: Provides a free trial, suitable for evaluating model performance.
Paid level: For detailed pricing, please contact Anthropic to obtain.
API access: Provided through the Anthropic API, mainly supports text processing.
Scenario recommendations
| Use scenarios | Recommended platform | reason |
|---|---|---|
| Multimodal content generation | Gemini | Supports processing of text, images, audio and video, suitable for tasks that require multiple data types. |
| Programming and technical tasks | Gemini | Excellent in programming tasks and capable of generating high-quality code. |
| Text generation and editing | Claude | Emphasizes text generation and editing capabilities, suitable for tasks that require high-quality text output. |
| Complex reasoning and analysis | Claude | Excellent in complex inference and analysis tasks, suitable for scenarios that require in-depth analysis. |
Summarize
Choose Gemini: If you need to work on multiple data types (such as images, audio, video), or want to take advantage of Google's ecosystem (such as search, Docs, Sheets), Gemini is a more suitable choice.
Choose Claude: If your main task is text processing, complex reasoning, or code writing, Claude is better suited to your needs.